The UN is the Enemy of You, Pt.1
Take it personally.
Transportation strikes and farmer protests have been erupting for months in Europe and are continuing to escalate in intensity as working class Europeans, Australians, and even Indians rally agains the agricultural policies of the United Nations (UN). There has been a lack of focus on the specific policies at the root of the ongoing protests, and as they are rather concrete and tangible concerns, I would like to address them in detail.
This evaluation will be published in multiple articles, and I will start with just a few of the agricultural components of the Agenda 2023 of the United Nations. In typical UN fashion, the Agenda is comprised of vague rhetoric and deceptive language that only becomes clear when paired with a clear and attentive perspective of world events (i.e., the European farmer protests). The example below is taken directly from the UN Agenda itself, briefly mentioning the pursuit of a future in which “value addition” and “non-farm employment” characterize the vanguard of “sustainable” agriculture.
I find it fascinating that the authors of this document, with all of their alleged superiority and intellect, are so obviously bereft of material understanding - particularly concerning sociology and biology. The programs they call sustainable are so fundamentally in opposition to human existence that the question is raised as to whether or not they have any interest in humanity at all. . . But I digress.
Back to the political details in question — the Agenda 2030 makes note of the Doha Development Round, named after the city of Doha, the Capital of Qatar. Coincidentally, this is also the location of the Hamas headquarters (a very lovely hotel actually). Thankfully, all well-adjusted citizens know that post-war international organizations have absolutely nothing to gain from terrorist activities that spin the wheel of perpetual war. Thankfully.
The “sustainable development” goals of the UN claim to be motivated by environmental interests. Scrutiny of the policies however reveals aims not so much focused on saving the environment, but rather a reticent strategy to seize land from the working class and hand it over to large corporations. If you take nothing else from this article, take this; the UN and every government and organization therein is advocating for this transfer in order to develop modern agriculture into a global plantation monoculture. This is the same thing that happened in Venezuela; the government has been bought out by large investment and development corporations that have everything to gain from society’s transition into neo-feudalism. These people, as well as their ideologies and organizations, have a practiced history in plantations, slavery, and feudalism.
I must yet again digress. . . the Agenda 2030 is only 41 pages, and I figure it may in fact be my due diligence to read the document thoroughly and in its entirety before I continue this article. So I ask that my readers grant me leave of a day or so and, in the meantime, view the following footage of some of the ongoing protests and assemblies of the working class against the UN’s tyrannical, greedy, and disingenuous agenda.
The first video shows Parisian protesters erecting walls around the homes of corrupt politicians. The following photo depicts a Polish plea for Putin. The last is of an Irishman expressing his frustration.
A nod of appreciation to every person participating in and publicly supporting the protests,
-the Shultz Report by M. Shultz