Unraveling the Iraq War: Exploring Influences, Agendas, and the Never-Ending Quest for Control
Some geopolitical musings for you to enjoy. Happy Sunday!
The short version:
The Iraq War was not just about securing access to oil, but it was also a means to further the agenda of a foreign power – Israel.
People deserve to know the true reasons for sending their loved ones into war.
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, introduced by representatives who have strong ties to Zionist organizations, marked the official beginning of the US-backed attempt to destabilize and destroy Saddam Hussein's regime.
This was followed by years of lobbying by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), proving the powerful influence of foreign powers on our government's actions and the falsity of the national sovereignty of any Western nation. And, regardless of their origin, the 9/11 attacks were undoubtedly utilized to further Zionist objectives.
The Project for a New American Century, founded by neo-conservatives with strong ties to Israel, admittedly aimed for a “benevolent global hegemony” and had members who later held influential positions in the George W. Bush administration, showcasing the manipulative and deceitful tactics used by foreign powers to further their agendas at the expense of American lives.
It is clear that the Iraq War was a scrimmage match for a larger conflict in the region, aimed at securing Western control over the energy industry and diminishing the power of countries like Russia and Iran. This, of course, has led to unnecessary suffering and loss of lives on all sides. Over 7,000 American troops died in the Iraq war which was planned for decades ahead of time, the details of which are expanded upon in the next segment.
The long version:
As is the case with much of the US’s corruption and international misgivings, the conflict in Iraq escalated significantly during the Clinton administration, specifically regarding the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. This was the initial point of the US-backed attempt to destabilize and destroy Saddam Hussein, which eventually led to the US invasion in 2003. Another less glaring result of the act was a decade of lobbying by the most powerful pro-Israel lobbying organization in the United States - the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
The bill was introduced by Representative Tom Lantos (D-CA) who was taken to Israel on an AIPAC-sponsored trip in 1996, and Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) who was the top recipient of pro-Israel campaign contributions in the 1996 election cycle. The bill was also co-sponsored by a majority of the House and Senate, including Sam Brownback (R-KS), Richard Burr (R-NC), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Joe Lieberman (D-CT), Benjamin Gilman (R-NY), Nita Lowey (D-NY), Peter Deutsch (D-FL), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Peter King (R-NY). So on and so forth.
Simultaneously, during the post-Gulf War period during which Ahmadinejad and Washington were largely in agreement, the US military conducted a number of clandestine operations within the country. Although it hasn’t been exactly confirmed, it is widely understood that the CIA was instrumental in helping the anti-Hussein forces set up bases and fund the ongoing operations of various militant groups in the hopes of successfully changing the regime. Considering the completely surprising attacks on 9/11, America’s actions in Iraq were probably done with the best of intentions. Also interesting and entirely unrelated to both the attacks on 9/11 and the current slaughter-fest in Palestine, is a turn-of-the-century think tank called the Project for a New American Century. Founded by NYC Zionist William Kristol & Victoria Nuland’s Zionist husband Robert Kagan in 1997, the organization considers itself to be a ‘non-profit educational organization.’ Work makes you free, right?
Kagan, our lovely Deputy Secretary of State’s husband, stated that the primary purpose of the organization was to establish a “benevolent global hegemony,’ specifically in the war-mongering style of Ronald Reagan. The PNAC's most prominent members are: Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Richard Armitage, John Bolton, Zalmay Khalilzad, Richard Perle, William Bennett, Dan Quayle, William Kristol, Colin Powell, Norman Podhoretz, and Robert Kagan, among others, of course.
It’s a shame that Americans, for all their decency (of which there is plenty) do not take it upon themselves to learn things by way of reading. If they did, they would be well aware of all of this already.
The Iraq War can be viewed as a scrimmage match in preparation for a much larger conflict aimed at securing Western access and control over the Caspian Basin, which necessarily involves the subjugation and diminishment of Russia and Iran as well as securing EU/NATO control over the smaller Caspian nations such as Kazakstan and Azerbaijan. I am currently working on a piece that dives deeper into the Caspian theatre. Still, in a broader sense, the US was successful in using the Iraq war in order to show the world its willingness to use force to achieve its foreign policy objectives.
If Western citizens are to avoid losing their sons to unethical foreign slaughter, they will have to recognize the various motivations for America/NATO international military operations. They will have to understand that NATO’s opposition to Iran and Russia have nothing whatsoever to do with “democracy” but rather center around both hegemonic control over the energy industry/international economy and the Zionist attacks on the sovereignty of Western nations. Security in the West, therefore, is necessarily dependent on the full cessation of the ridiculous and unethical war being waged against Iran and Russia.
-The Shultz Report by M. Shultz